“Dark Side” Beckons & Local Pol Answers The Call

Ward 1 City Council member Sabra Briere recently voted to kill a resolution intended to protect parkland from de facto sale through leasing—a strategy being used by John Hieftje and his Council pals to try to “repurpose” a several acre parcel of fragile river-front parkland on Fuller Road. First, Hieftje wanted to lease the land to the University of Michigan for a parking tower. That deal fell through (and, interestingly, Hieftje fell off the list of part-time faculty employed by U of M, though his wife remains a U of M temp at the School of Music). Now, Hieftje wants to use the Fuller Road parkland for a new train station. The move has miffed the local chapter of the Sierra Club. Club leaders have condemned the attempts to crib parkland without a public vote—as called for in the city’s Charter. The effort to “repurpose” parkland became a rallying cry for several candidates who ran for City Council in both 2011 and 2012, three of whom were successful in their bids, including Sally Hart Petersen, who ran against incumbent Tony Derezinski and Jane Lumm, who crushed incumbent Stephen Rapundalo. Both Rapunds and Tony D. had repeatedly voted in support of “repurposing” parkland.

Another incumbent who supported the parks-for-parking scheme is Ward 4 Council member Margie Teall. Her seat hangs in the balance on a 18 vote margin which will be decided at a September 4th recount.

Briere’s (pictured left) July 2012 vote against parkland protection, against giving voters the right to decide whether to include leasing as a part of the Charter protection that requires a public vote, might not seem strange unless you know that a few days before she voted to torpedo the parkland protection proposal, she asked to co-sponsor it. Why would Briere torpedo an effort to protect parks in a city where such behavior can cost a politico votes, friends and funding? More puzzling still, why would Sabra Briere vote against a proposed resolution which, just a week earlier, she had sought to co-sponsor?

It’s a story filled with small town political ambition and lots of not-so-Machiavellian plotting.

I live in Ward 1, near Bandemer Park and the Huron River—the Gelman/Pall 1,4 dioxane plume has contaminated the ground water within 3,000 feet from our house just on the other side of the river. Thanks to the spread of the plume, thousands of houses in Ann Arbor are now sitting atop brownfields, and the plume is heading toward our city’s largest drinking water source at Barton Pond. Incumbent City Council member Ron Suarez pulled out of the 2008 race after the deadline for removing his name from the ballot, infuriating many local Dems. The reasons for his withdrawl from the race were no surprise: he was being “Groomed” by the Hive Mind Collective. “Groomed,” as A2P readers may remember refers to a term coined by former Ward 3 City Council member Leigh Greden to describe the systematic exclusion and bullying of Council members who refuse to be assimilated. It is a term named for former Ward 1 City Council member Kim Groome, who, like Suarez, routinely infuriated Hieftje and the Hive Mind by refusing to vote in lock-step. Kim Groome left her Council seat  (and Ann Arbor, along with her family) mid-term, without so much as a public fare-thee-well you SOBs.

Ward 5 resident, and former long-time Washtenaw County Commish Vivienne Armentrout, who recently ran for City Council a second time, described “Grooming” thusly in a 2009 blog entry:

Since the local Democratic party was mostly organized to support Democrats against Republicans in the general election, this put a monopoly in power, and they were able to enjoy several years unchallenged except by token and easily vanquished Republicans. Once in place, a Democratic incumbent was seldom challenged, and usually there was no contest even in a first election. This was made even smoother by a practice of appointing chosen candidates to fill vacated seats, so that there was an instant incumbent.

But a few wavelets began to appear in this smooth sea.  The chosen candidates of the ruling coalition began to encounter challenges.  In the troublesome First Ward in particular, first Kim Groome (2002) and then Ron Suarez (2006) were elected. They weren’t with the program (which I will characterize loosely as pro-development without arguing all the points).  As a result, they were treated badly.  Although I’ve never heard this directly from her, it is thought in some circles that Kim Groome was driven out of town by nastiness.

How does a group control unruly members?  By the classic methods: shunning, nasty comments, and body language.  In the case of an elected body, this is called “marginalization.”  When the target speaks, everyone’s attention is elsewhere.  Nasty comments are applied directly or to others.  Smirks behind not-too-well held hands.  Meetings are held without the target’s being informed.  Appointments are made only to unconsequential committees.  Emails and other messages are either not returned or are given short or nasty twists.   Note the references to pandering (actually paying attention to one group or another) and the “Golden Vomit Award” given to Sabra Briere (I’m sure that whatever comments she was making at the time were considered and well-spoken).  If this were a gang of chimpanzees, similar methods would be used, perhaps using more fruit and fewer electronics.

To most people who survived Junior High/Middle School, the “marginalization” Armentrout describes will sound familiar. Armentrout, it is rumored, left the Washtenaw County Board of Commissioners after she was “marginalized” by her fellow Ann Arbor County Commissioners Leah Gunn and Barbara Levin Bergman—both of whom are retiring from the BOC after their current terms are up. Former Pittsfield County Commissioner Kristin Judge made no secret of being bullied and “marginalized” by Levin Bergman and Gunn, often via email. Like Groome, Judge left before completing her term.

Short of leaving office, as did Groome, Suarez and Judge, there is another way to deal with “marginalization” and that is to capitulate. In Vichy-controlled France during WW II such people were called “collaborators.” Women who collaborated had their heads shaved after the Vichy regime fell, so as to be easily recognizable. It was a particularly effective means of punishment—think The Scarlet Letter. As Armentrout’s entry, above, indicates yet another Ward 1 Council member was treated to “marginalization.” Sabra Briere won her first Democratic primary with only 421 total votes. Hers was a stinging defeat to the Hive Mind, who had appointed a reliable pal in 2005 to finish out Groome’s term. Their candidate pulled just 309 votes in a 3-way race.

Briere and Suarez—who routinely voted in opposition to Borg Queen Hieftje and the Hive Mind—were treated to much of the marginalization described by Armentrout, above. Both Council members (along with Ward 5 Council member Mike Anglin) continually questioned the need for a $50 million dollar city hall. While Briere refused to openly support a 2008 attempt to gather enough signatures to put the question to the voters of whether city officials should borrow money for the city hall project, she supported a signature drive behind-the-scenes. Briere’s husband, attorney David Cahill, worked openly to organize the drive. Ask Voters First was just the kind of political uppiness that Hieftje and his Hive Mind Collective can’t tolerate. Ron Suarez and Mike Anglin openly endorsed the effort organized and funded by a group of citizen activists, including A2Politico’s recipient of its first annual citizen activism award, attorney and CPA Karen Sidney.

The 2012 City Council campaigns that touched on the need for greater transparency (Sumi Kailasapathy, Petersen and Jack Eaton) in city government are rooted in revelations that came to light three ears earlier. In 2009, shortly before the newspaper closed, it was revealed by the Ann Arbor News that City Council members endorsed (and in several cases recruited) by mayor John Hieftje were using email during open meetings to make fun of citizen speakers, their Council colleagues, to rig votes and script debates, among other things. The misuse of email during public meetings represented a staggering lack of leadership on Hieftje’s part, and triggered an Open Meetings violation lawsuit which the city was forced to settle. More than that, it was clear that the city’s elected officials had repeatedly misled the public about plans for major development projects, including their desire to sell parkland, and build promptly atop the Fifth Avenue underground parking garage after its completion. Many of the same citizens who had supported Ask Voters First then pushed for the release of several years worth of emails sent during Council meetings. Sabra Briere and Mike Anglin were asked to co-sponsor a resolution to require city officials release Council’s emails.

Anglin brought forward the resolution (which failed) to release the emails to the public. Briere refused; keeping her seat on City Council had became more important than transparency in government. In 2009, when she ran for re-election, she called herself  “a neighborhood activist.” She said in a video interview, “My job is to make certain to listen what they’re (her constituents are) telling me….It’s really easy to represent my own views. That’s not my job.”

Watch the AnnArbor.com 2009 election season video interview with Briere below:

According to 2007 campaign finance forms filed with the Washtenaw County Clerk’s office, Briere raised a little over $3,900 from donors, the majority of whom resided in Ward 1. In 2009, Briere committed a campaign finance violation by taking $1,000 from local developer Dennis Dahlmann (She also took $300 from Dahlmann’s attorney, not a violation, but perhaps a not-so-subtle attempt to circumvent campaign finance rules). She also took a $150 donation from Charles Gelman, whose company (prior to its sale) was responsible for the contamination of the groundwater in and around Ann Arbor with 1,4 dioxane. In the video, above, Briere trades on the need to “clean-up” the river, but in five years representing Ward 1 has not crafted any resolutions regarding the 1,4 dioxane contamination or the lackluster clean-up efforts that have frustrated city residents.

By 2011, Briere was playing the game, albeit rather ham-handedly. She took a donation from state representative candidate Adam Zemke and then subsequently endorsed Zemke’s candidacy. In 2011, she took $500 from Dennis Dahlmann, the legal maximum donation. In September 2011, Council members voted a 10-0 vote to appoint four members, including Council Member Sabra Briere, to the city’s new Ann Arbor Medical Marijuana Advisory Board board. One month later, Briere took a $500 campaign donation from Mark Passerini, a University of Michigan graduate and co-founder of the OM of Medicine (medical marijuana) dispensary on Main Street. Passerini’s was one of the largest legal donations she received in 2011. Meanwhile, at an October 2011 fundraiser, Briere took in just $50 at an event attended by 20 people—a fundraiser that cost $264 to put on.

By 2011, Briere’s refusal to second his resolutions in favor of government transparency, in favor of reconsidering the use of parkland for parking, and the need to spend $1.2 million to run a sewer line to the middle of an empty field on Fuller Road, along with other run-ins, poisoned her relationship with popular Ward 5 Council member Mike Anglin. As a result, campaign finance forms show that donations from Ward 5 residents, those who’d supported her in 2007 and 2009, including numerous Ward 5 neighborhood neighborhood activists, dried up. In fact, without the donations from Dahlmann and Passerini, Briere would have raised $500 less in 2011—after years on City Council—than she had in 2007, the first year she ran. By 2011, Sabra Briere had told others that she wanted to run for mayor. In February 2012, she had told the local news blog. Another politico who boasted about running for mayor was former Ward 2 Council member Tony Derezinski, whose constituents booted him out of office six months afterwards in favor of “a fresh voice.”

It’s 2012 and Sabra Briere is now sucking up to Hieftje like a calf to the teet. Here’s what she told AnnArbor.com about Hieftje in February 2012: “John raised the visibility — he increased people’s awareness — of this role. John has a national awareness and people on the national scene are aware of him. He’s gone to the national conference of mayors. He’s worked with people in Washington. Those are not necessarily things that previous mayors did and that’s an important aspect. It’s not the ceremonial position it was when Ingrid Sheldon or Ed Pierce were mayor.”

Sheldon’s supporters roll their eyes at Briere’s efforts to puff up Hieftje’s thin educational and mayoral record at the expense of his predecessors. A Sheldon supporter pointed out that, “While mayor, Ingrid served on the board of the Michigan Association of Mayors. She was president of the Michigan Municipal League.” Mayor Ed Pierce was a doctor who served as a state senator prior to his run for mayor. In Lansing, Pierce was the chair of the Health and Social Services Committee.

Briere’s votes in favor of using parking for parking, against the resolution to protect parkland from leasing, against using surplus funds to hire more police and firefighters, in favor tax increases, in favor of layoffs for firefighters, among others, have put her in Hieftje’s good graces, but at odds with Ward 1 constituents and those same political activists who supported Ask Voters First. This group of city-wide activists worked on the campaigns of 2010, 2011 and 2012 candidates who’ve succeeded in taking down four of Hieftje’s Council supporters. The losses began with the take-down of former Ward 3 Council member Leigh Greden. The losses accelerated with the heave-ho of Ward 1 Council member Sandi Smith, Stephen Rapundalo and Tony Derezinski. Hieftje no longer has a majority, endangering development and transit projects on which he has longed to fritter away as much as, perhaps, a billion in local tax dollars.

Sabra Briere, hauled some heavy water on July 9, 2012 when she signed on to co-sponsor Anglin and Lumm’s parkland protection resolution and then killing it one week later. The truth is that Sabra Briere has been hauling heavy water for Hieftje for some time, voting against Anglin, Lumm and Ward 3 Council member Stephen Kunselman, refusing to second their resolutions. The difference this time, however, is that in response to constituent questions and criticisms about the parkland protection vote Briere lied.

This is what she wrote to Ward 1 constituents on August 3, 2012:

The second resolution is to place a charter amendment on the ballot that would require voter approval prior to the City entering into any long-term (over 5 years) lease of park land for any purpose that isn’t park — or recreation — related. This item was on the agenda at the Council’s last meeting (July 16) and was postponed – and I moved to postpone it.  When I offered to co-sponsor the resolution, it said one thing; when it was amended, it said something different.  I didn’t really notice how different it was until the afternoon of July 16th.

In this video (City of Ann Arbor – Video (powered by LEIGHTRONIX) from the July 16th City Council meeting, Jane Lumm tells Council members: “This resolution is co-sponsored by Council members Anglin and Briere….You all received a copy of the resolution a week ago (July 9th). It is unchanged from that version.” According to city officials, Briere contacted them on July 9th and asked to co-sponsor the resolution along with Anglin and Lumm.

Briere’s claim to constituents that “when I offered to co-sponsor the resolution, it said one thing; when it was amended, it said something different.  I didn’t really notice how different it was until the afternoon of July 16th” is an attempt to deliberately mislead not only Ward 1 voters, but people across the city to whom she sends out her e-newsletter. She seems to want to make it appear as though Lumm and Anglin’s resolution was flawed by changes that had been made to it between the day she offered to co-sponsor and the July 16th Council meeting in which she opened discussion on the resolution by torpedoing it. Along with the city’s attorney, Lumm had worked with a number of parks activists on crafting the proposed Charter amendment, including politically-powerful Gwen Nysteun (a former member of the city’s Parks Advisory Commission) and members of the local chapter of the Sierra Club.

Council member Briere did not reply to multiple email messages asking her to point out the differences she alleges in the her August 3, 2012 e-newsletter existed between the resolution sent to Council members by Lumm one week prior to the July 16th meeting and the resolution presented at the July 16th meeting. Software used to track receipt of email messages indicated that the messages had been delivered to Briere’s email account and opened.

Briere’s current term ends in 2013. It remains to be seen if she will join anti-parks, anti-environment politicos Greden, Rapundalo, Smith and Derezinski in the political landfill. Thanks to her shabby treatment of Lumm, Briere is earning herself a bad name in monied Ward 2. Trash-talking dead Democrat Ed Pierce, and trying to make Republican Ingrid Sheldon look like Forrest Gump in AnnArbor.com is unwise, to say the least. After all, it was Ingrid Sheldon who, 10 months after Briere called her a “ceremonial” figurehead of a politico, went on to help Independent Jane Lumm raise $24,000 which Lumm put to good use in crushing long-time incumbent Stephen Rapundalo.

This isn’t the first time Sabra Briere has mislead her constituents with her e-newsletter. She’s done it before. It is, however, one of her most brazen efforts to cover her political tracks. Anglin and Lumm both took on Hieftje and his Council drones in 2012 by donating to and supporting candidates opposing Hieftje picks in Wards 1, 2, 4 and 5. Lumm and Anglin’s willingness to openly confront Hieftje politically, coupled with their willingness to collaborate closely with members of the community on issues such as the environment, development, preservation, transportation and finance only adds to their collective power and popularity. Should Anglin and Lumm openly line up against Sabra Briere in 2013, and work to land money and support for a candidate opposing her, Briere would face a very steep uphill re-election battle. Her ability to rustle up support and fundraise is being hampered by her own voting record. In addition, over the past three election cycles Hieftje and his Hive Mind drones have never endorsed or donated to her campaigns.

Ronald E. Riggio, Ph.D. is a psychologist who has studied deception. He says, “I’m more interested in the hows and whys of lies told by political leaders.” So why do elected officials lie? It’s pretty simple, explains Dr. Riggio, “So, leaders (and con artists) learn that they can lie and often get away with it.” Riggio goes to suggest a relatively simple solution. “Question authority! Become informed. Check the facts. Don’t simply believe what a leader says because he or she is in a position of authority and power. It is a good follower’s job to be a reality check on the leader.”

Short URL: http://www.a2politico.com/?p=14401

19 Comments for ““Dark Side” Beckons & Local Pol Answers The Call”

  1. WOW! Just WOW. Sabra Briere needs to explain herself – for starters why she didn’t answer emails askingfor some brief comment about why she pretended that the Lumm resolution was different when she co-sponsored and when she shot it down. I’m so tired of these people playing games. hieftje, Briere and the rest of the Hive Mind should come and and say ‘We want the option to lease parkland.’ Ok. Then we can just vote them out of office, or not. Instead, it’s all this time wasted on obvious subterfuge and behavior worthy of middle schoolers. Jane Lumm and Mike Anglin deserve our thanks for putting up with this kind of stuff.

  2. Vivienne Armentrout

    it is not accurate to say that I was “marginalized” by Leah Gunn and Barbara Bergman. Marginalization implies that you are isolated from the group and unable to exert any influence. In fact, I was able to retain a fair amount of influence, with several allies and the respect if not always agreement of a number of other commissioners. I secured good appointments and accomplished goals such as the Washtenaw County Comprehensive Plan and the establishment of the Planning Advisory Board (that has subsequently been disbanded, along with the entire county planning apparatus).

    It is accurate to say that I was bullied by Gunn (Bergman was more of an accomplice). She created a hostile atmosphere in which I was, however, able to function, though at a certain personal cost. I left the BOC for a variety of personal reasons as well as simple fatigue with playing the political game necessary. But I had just won a difficult primary and most people expected me to stay indefinitely. It was not a case of being marginalized out.

  3. Hmm I think I may be able to put some info together……do you have a direct E mail?

  4. There is a bar stool open next to Tony D at their favorite watering hole….Knights……Good Luck to Mike Woodyard Ann Arbors “Good ole Boys” need to stop using our tax dollars and political positions, to fatten their personal pockets

    • @A2fu care to back up your claims of corruption? I’ve heard that local contractors do work gratis on the houses of pols, and (from reliable sources) that Hieftje was a major drug dealer. I’ve even had a phone call from one of Conan Smith’s employees with tales that Smith is embezzling from his job. Without proof such as records of police arrests, canceled checks, contractors who will blab on the record, however, it’s just so much hot air, right?

  5. @Mark thanks for the interesting tip about Judge Connors. I’m curious to know whether the Court has a conflict of interest policy enforced by one of the judges or it’s simply left up to the judge and lawyers to hash out any potential conflicts. I have written about the Council’s need to address the conflicts when UM employees vote on issues relating to UM. It’s an ongoing problem and a serious one.

    • @A2Politico:

      “…..I’m curious to know whether the Court has a conflict of interest policy enforced by one of the judges or it’s simply left up to the judge and lawyers to hash out any potential conflicts.”

      Actually, the Michigan Supreme Court promulgates the Code of Judicial Conduct which includes conflict of interest rules; these rules govern outside activities that a judge may engage or may not engage in. The State of Michigan Constitution of 1963 created the Judicial Tenure Commission which is a body charged with enforcing violations of that judicial code of conduct.

      If a party to a court case feels an improper conflict of interest exists with respect to a jurist, they can ask the trial judge to disqualify themselves from hearing the case and if the judge refuses, can petition the chief judge of the court to rehear that disqualification motion; this procedure is in effect statewide as part of the Michigan Rules of Court.

      “I have written about the Council’s need to address the conflicts when UM employees vote on issues relating to UM. It’s an ongoing problem and a serious one.”

      Agreed. There should be an ethics ordinance passed that prevents City Council members from voting on matters that affect those whom they have employment or other financial relations with. Someone like like Steve Kunselman could reasonably be perceived as under some sort of possible pressure to vote favorably on matters related to his employer, U-M. Data at umsalary.info suggests that Steve received some handsome salary increases the last few years – could this possibly influence his vote?

      Who was responsible for hiring Christpher Taylor’s employer – the Butzel Long law firm
      – to defend the sex harassment case brought by probation officer Wayne Wade against Julie Creal and court supervisory personnel? Leigh Greden’s former employer Miller Canfield has had an attorney-client relationship with University of Michigan; could this have influenced his votes on matters?

      • @Mark, thanks a bunch for the answer. I’m thinking about interviewing Judge Connors about this, if he’s willing, and why shouldn’t he be? As for Taylor, he moved to Hooper Hathaway in September 2011. http://www.hooperhathaway.com/2011/09/hooper-hathaway-welcomes-marta-manildi-and-christopher-taylor/ Be that as it may, a search of the city’s financial records shows LOADS of work given to city attorney Stephen Postema’s old law firm, as well as to the companies of Hieftje’s board and committee appointees (some no bid contracts). In order to even begin to question whether Kunselman’s salary increases were related to his votes (or lack thereof), you’d have to compare the timing of both the votes and the raises. Even then, it’s causality. It’s not a bad idea to pay attention that that sort of thing, as I think Hieftje got the boot (or it was mutually decided he’d leave) in part because of pressure from A2Politico about the conflicts of interest involved in hiring a guy with a BA as one of the highest paid lecturers in his class to teach grad school at UM AFTER he was elected.

        • Steve Postema’a old firm, Bodman, is one of the priciest law firms in Metro Detroit and it is interesting to see if there was any competitive process to get this outside work.

          The AATA retained two expensive outside firms to defend the ALCU suit to install a “Boycott Israel” motto ad on city buses. Dave Askins reports almost $6,000 was billed by one of the firms for the first month of legal representation.

          As for Judge Timothy Connors, he is now involved in a heated re-election race to be decided this November, facing Michael Woodyard, a veteran prosecutor with an anti-corruption unit in Kym Worthy’s office. Prosecutor Worthy is endorsing his candidacy.

          • @Mark, I visited Woodyard’s FB page where he had posted what he said was an anonymous letter sent to him telling him to drop out of the race. The letter was pretty interesting and if it’s authentic, is classic intimidation.

            • @A2Politico:

              Thanks for the heads up about the disgusting letter sent to candidate Michael Woodyard “asking” him to withdraw from the race against Connors.

              There have been a number of problems and questionable incidents that have occurred in the circuit court that stem when Connors was appointed chief judge. Connors got a fellow hired named Dwyer who used to be employed with the Michigan Department of Corrections to be court aministrator (who I believe is still there). One of his deputies, also a former MDOC employee, named Kim Elmer was in charge of administering the circuit court jury system, was investigated by the Washtenaw County Sheriff’s Department and later arraigned on embezzlement charges; the Sheriff’s Department issued a public statement indicating the full extent of the missing funds was still being investigated and then unknown. annarbor.com covered that story up until the arraignment last year but failed to report anything further – which is sad; the public should be kept abreast of all criminal proceedings when a court official has been charged.

              I hope Michael Woodyard wins this November to help bring some dignity back to the circuit court.

            • @A2Politico, Thank you for the link.

              It is amazing what Connors’ supporters will stoop to.

              I will vote for Mike Woodyard this November.

        • @A2Politico.com:

          This Saturday, at a membership meeting of the Ann Arbor Democratic Party, Judge Timothy Connors appeared to seek the endorsement of the AADP for the November circuit court election. Ann Arbor School Board member Susan Baskett, A2 ACLU legal director David Cahill, and prominent longtime local Ann Arbor attorney appeared at the meeting to give testimonials in support of Judge Connors.

          An AADP member raised the issue of whether a judge should also be a U-M employee; Connors acknowledeged he is employed by U-M and his dual employment vis a vis the court and U-M had been raised before. Mike Woodyard said that judicial disqualification in such proceedings should be decided on a case-by-case basis.

          Jack Eaton made a motion for the AADP not to make any endorsement in the Connors/Woodyard race. The Eaton motion was granted by a vote of 47-7. Connors left the meeting without the endorsement he sought.

          • Addendum:

            The Woodyard4judge Facebook site recently covered the AADP meeting and the background.

            Mr. Woodyard cited the lopsided vote as evidence of the integrity of the political system.

            Many prominent Ann Arbor Democrats appeared to speak and/or vote on the issue – including Kathy Griswold, Sabra Briere, Blair Shelton, Ingrid Ault, members of the Bar and others. The total attendance at the meeting was about 80 when a typical AAPD membership meeting has only about 20 attendees.

    • @a2politico.com:

      With respect to Judge Timothy Connors, there was a Judicial Tenure Commission “cautionary letter” issued to Judge Connors for allocating court resources for the purposes of his own and a second cndiadate’s campaign committee; check the “In The News” section and click on “My Opponent’s Record” subsection of Michael Woodyard’s campaign website http://www.woodyard4judge.com

      The “My Opponent’s Record” subsection also chronicles multiple cases over the years where Connors was found to have been rebuked or reversed by appeals courts for his rulings – often clearly goofy and nonsensical. This compendium “scratches the surface” as to why there are so many citizens now supporting Woodyard – most incumbent judges never face opposition. Connors’ demeanor and chronic errors have left many citizens and bar members screaming for a replacement to Connors.

      Regarding the employment of Connors at U-M, check out web.law.umich.edu/_facultyBioPage/facultybiopagenew.asp?ID=563

      That link indicates that Margaret Connors, the judge’s spouse was just hired to “co-teach” with her husband family law at the University of Michigan Law School for the Winter 2013 semester. Her bio indicates no background in family law (her career was largely limited to the Washtenaw County Prosecutor’s Office).

  6. “…and interestingly, Hieftje fell off the list of part-time faculty employed by U-M, though his wife remains a U of M temp in the School of Music.”

    John Hieftje, with a mere bachelor’s degree in political science from Eastern Michigan University served as an “intermittent lecturer” in the Gerald R. Ford School of Public Policy earning approximately $33,000.00 for purely very limited part-time work in what is known as a “one-third appointment.” He did actually teach there; I was acquainted with one of his former students who was a graduate student at the time. Hieftje’s salary rate made him reportedly the second-highest paid lecturer at the University of Michigan (out of over 1,000). John’s wife, Kathryn Goodson, last I checked, was earning about $63,000.00 per annum as a voice teacher, but I believe as of that juncture, she was a full-time employee; and being a former Fulbright scholar, she does have some credentials that warrant being a faculty member at the University.

    Other local elected officials also have current or past employment relationships with the University of Michigan, despite the fact that the City Council regularly deliberates and votes on matters such as leases and service contracts that run between the City of Ann Arbor and U-M.

    Mayor Pro Tempore Marcia Higgins had been employed full-time in the School of Engineering as an administrative assistant earning over $44,000.00 per year, however Ann Arbor Chronicle editor Dave Askins has reported Marcia recently quit her U-M employment.

    Third Ward City Councilman Steve Kunselman has also held full-time employment with U-M.

    Current Second Ward lame-duck council member Anthony Derezinski has, in the past, had a limited employment relationship with U-M, however this employment may have pre-dated his tenure on City Council.

    Washtenaw County Circuit Judge Timothy Connors commenced part-time employment with the University of Michigan Law School in 2008. He has received compensation at a higher rate than President Mary Sue Coleman, although the scarcity of hours means that his overall pay is less than Coleman, who obviously works full-time. Connors earned well over $40,000.00 in 2008 and a whopping $54,000+ in therecent year of 2010 – not bad for teaching an advocacy course out of his own courtroom to U-M law students. Like Hieftje, Timothy Connors has received handsome compensation for very, very limited hours of student instruction. The Washtenaw County Circuit Court hears a heavy caseload of court actions involving the University of Michigan. Connors has heard a number of high-profile cases involving U-M while sitting as circuit judge:

    (1) a Freedom of Information Act enforcement action by a teacher’s union in which he denied the union access to U-M employees’ home addresses and phone numbers, the ruling was reversed by the Court of Appeals before being heard and the Court of appeals decision vacated by the Michigan Supreme Court in 2008;

    (2) several cases involving medical malpractice claims against U-M Hospital
    and/or their physicians;

    (3) a civil rights action filed by former U-M Hospital emergency room physician Catherine Wilkerson, M.D. that went to the state supreme court.

    Also needing to be mentioned is:

    (A) Edward Connors, the father of Timothy Connors, once had served for several years as president of U-M Hospital;

    (B) Judge Connors’ spouse Margaret Connors, then serving with the Washtenaw County Prosecutor’s Office, prosecuted a criminal case in Ann Arbor’s 15th District Court, tried a misdemeanor attempted obstruction of justice jury case in which Wilkerson was acquitted in December of 2007- while her aforesaid civil rights case against U-M Hospital was pending.

    Anybody wanting to confirm University of Michigan employment and their rate of pay and actual compensation can check at http://www.umsalary.info

You must be logged in to post a comment Login

Error, no group ID set! Check your syntax!

Recently Commented

  • Trish: Read my posts, be strong, dont expect to be treated nicely, and just pray that her common... %comment_rating
  • La Tecia: A month ago I let my 15 year old go live with his dad. Hardest thing ever! %comment_rating
  • Leslie: I googled “Should I let my kids live with their dad” and this story came up. I... %comment_rating
  • Trish: Unfortunately, I have to add to my own post. Things have went from bad to worse, I had been... %comment_rating