A2Politico: Ann Arbor Politics Grilled To Perfection

January 10, 2010

County Commish Barbara Levin-Bergman Serves Up La Vengeance Froide And Ends Up With Egg On Her Face

VN:F [1.9.3_1094]
Rate this posting
Rating: 5.0/5 (5 votes cast)

Ann Arbor Washtenaw County Commissioner Barbara Levin-Bergman has been on the Washtenaw Board of Commissioners since James Madison was president. Elected shortly before the War of 1812, rumors abound that Bergman held off the British as they attempted to cross Washtenaw County on their way to Washington, D.C. to give Dolley Madison’s house at 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue a make-over.  

As for Ann Arbor Grande Dem Bergman, recent actions show she is more concerned with maintaining the status quo, than in encouraging innovative policy-making and creative problem-solving. Thus, when Pittsfield Township newbie County Commissioner Kristin Judge and Barbara Bergman had a spat in public at a BOC’s meeting, it was clear that Bergman was not going to just sit back and let some uppity white woman from Pittsfield Township get away with not bowing and scraping to the uppity white woman from Ann Arbor who has been in office for two centuries.

But as French novelist Marie Joseph Eugène Sue wrote: la vengeance se mange très-bien froide. In English, “Revenge is a dish best served cold.”

Bergman’s personal chef du maison whipped up a dish of La Vengeance Froide, and Bergman served it to Kristin Judge on January 6th. At the County Commissioners’ first meeting of the year, where the Commissioners divvy up leadership positions, there was exactly one dissenting vote cast against exactly one County Commissioner. Can you fill in the blanks? 

Kristin Judge stood for re-election as co-Chair of the Washtenaw County Board of Commissioners Ways and Means Committee. Barbara Bergman voted against Judge’s candidacy. Then, Bergman proceeded to explain for the record why she’d voted no on Judge’s candidacy. According to a January 8, 2010 piece posted to AnnArborChronicle.com, Bergman announced that “Judge had made a personal, unprovoked attack on her, and that it did not demonstrate leadership behavior.”

Frankly, I think unprovoked attacks demonstrate incredible initiative, but I digress.

Daguerretypes posted to the County’s web site, show Bergman with two blackened eyes and her jaw wired partially closed. Obviously, the unprovoked attack by Judge, whom photos on the County web site show with a sardonic smile and a slightly bruised ego, had been a political donny-brook. To read about the dust-up at the BOC Roller Derby at which Judge “attacked” Bergman, click here

In going after Judge, Bergman is forgetting whom she serves and why. Kristin Judge wants to make sure the public’s best interests are well represented when it comes to how the county spends the $190,000,000 dollars we give them. Thus, Judge has been going through the county’s budget line-by-line and Bergman, along with other Commissioners, have accused her of micro-managing. 

At the January 6, 2010 meeting, right after Barbara Bergman announced that Kristin Judge lacked leadership skills, Judge announced that she plans to disclose her expense account spending publicly. She is the first and only County Commissioner to do this. (To find out when Conan Smith blows $800 a night on hotel rooms, you’ll have to FOIA his credit card receipts.) It was Judge who turned in her county paid cell phone and announced that the county could save $370,000 by getting rid of that perk. She took a shellacking from Ann Arbor Commissioners Smith and Irwin for that “stunt,” and found herself accused of political “grandstanding.” It was also Kristin Judge who pushed for Commissioner Conan Smith’s ridiculous (and possibly illegal) attempt to stifle free speech at Board meetings to be rescinded this year. In 2009, when Smith was elected Chair of the Ways and Means Committee, he spearheaded the effort to change the Board’s rules and limit what topics the public could bring up during commentary before the Board’s Ways & Means Committee. He also moved to trim the time alloted from five minutes to three minutes. If you’re interested in reading why Smith wanted to stifle free speech, click here.

I say to Kristin Judge, grandstand and micro-manage to your heart’s content. Lord knows the four Ann Arbor Commissioners (Conan Smith, Jeff Irwin, Barbara Bergman and Leah Gunn) let retiring County Administrator Robert Guenzel have his way with them and the budget, and run the County $30 million dollars into the hole. Those four Ann Arbor Dem commissioners have often voted as a block in favor of Guenzel-inspired fiscal policies that were predicated on Guenzel’s belief that the county’s economy would forever grow, and the tax base would never shrink. Their lack of leadership demonstrated incredible fiscal naivité and more hubris than is healthy in even a politico. 

Washtenaw County residents desperately need more BOC leadership like that demonstrated by Kristin Judge, and for Ann Arbor Commissioners Smith, Bergman and Gunn to follow Guenzel to wherever it is that politicians go who leave trusting citizens holding the bag for huge structural deficits. 

As for Bergman, by wasting her vote to even a personal score, she ended up with egg on her face—a dish best never served at all.

Popularity: 20% [?]

December 16, 2009

The Politics of Education: For The Open BOE Seat, Only Yes Men (and Women) Need Apply

VN:F [1.9.3_1094]
Rate this posting
Rating: 4.8/5 (4 votes cast)

In a recent post to AnnArbor.com, writer David Jesse discusses who the next member of the Ann Arbor Board of Education might be. In his piece, Jesse writes, “Responding to a question…asked, board members detailed their general thoughts about what made a successful board member, and by extension, what they’re looking for in a person to join them at the board table. In short, board members want someone who will fit with the board, someone who won’t be ‘divisive’ and someone who supports the current administration.”

In short, no one with philosophical differences to those held by the current Board members need apply. After all, the last thing we want on Boards representing the interests of the taxpayers are individuals with potentially differing viewpoints. I found it profoundly disturbing that the current Board members counseled BOE Treasurer Randy Friedman not to resign when he purchased a second home in Birmingham so his children would have a shorter commute to the private school they attend there. This act showed quite clearly that this group of people wouldn’t hesitate to put personal relationships above the good of the District, parents, students and taxpayers. Why do I say this? Not a single one of them made a peep after Friedman’s attendance rate at board meetings, committee meetings and study sessions plummeted to an abysmal 17.8 percent after his purchase of his Birmingham home. I wrote about Friedman’s attendance record here.

Alas, this propensity toward preferring to sit on Boards populated by dittoheads is not confined to the BOE that handles $190,000,000 of our tax money. It was a main topic of the 2008 City Council race, as well. Ann Arbor News writer Judy McGovern painted the City Council candidates Stewart Nelson and Vivienne Armentrout as candidates whose views were not aligned with those of the Council majority (the lot of whom were subsequently all caught up in the Council email scandal and pending lawsuit over emails sent during open Council meetings that allegedly allowed secret deliberations). 

In July 2008, County Commissioner Conan Smith and his wife, 53rd District State Representative Rebekah Warren, sent this email justifying their collective endorsement of Carsten Hohnke over the exponentially more experienced candidate Vivienne Armentrout:

From: Conan Smith [mailto:conan@suburbsalliance.org] 
Sent: Thursday, July 10, 2008 12:07 AM
To: ’Vivienne Armentrout’
Subject: Council Race

Vivienne,
After long deliberation, Rebekah and I have decided to give our support to Carsten in the upcoming council race.  As we studied council’s actions over the past year, we came to the conclusion that we are more concerned by the divisions that are emerging between two factions than by the actual decisions that the council ultimately comes to.  We see a breakdown in productive relationships and a disregard for effective civic engagement dominating the process.  With the momentous issues that the city will have to deal with in coming years, we feel that restoring balance to the process is the most pressing issue.  It’s our opinion that Carsten has the better chance to bridge that gap, due in part to his strong relationships with the “veteran majority” and his clear and vocal commitment to fully engage the variety of neighborhood voices that have been left out of the conversation in recent years. 

We have not made our support public as of yet but will in the next few days.  As I pledged, you are the first person that we have told.  I have no doubt that should you win this race that you will be a superb councilwoman.  You very clearly reflect our values in your actions—as has Carsten in our conversations—so it was not without significant reflection that we came to this point. 

Conan

Thanks to pieces published in the Ann Arbor News in June and July 2009, as well as in the new AnnArbor.com newspaper and on their web site, Ann Arborites have subsequently come to see thanks to FOIAed emails sent by the “veteran majority” (not to mention Carsten Hohnke) during Council meetings, that “the process” Smith and Warren fretted about protecting involved mocking citizens, playing on Facebook during Council meetings, scripting debates, rigging votes and subverting the spirit, if not the letter, of the Open Meetings Act. Whether Smith and Warren understood the pathology of the system to which they were trying to “restore balance” by endorsing Carsten Hohnke instead of Armentrout, is open for discussion.

The current BOE members circled the wagons after the millage defeat and took absolutely no responsibility for the District’s financial situation. According to Friedman, Susan Baskett, Deb Mexicotte, Glen Nelson, Irene Patalan and Adam Hollier the problems rest instead with state funding shortfalls, the economy, and ultimately with the evil empire that mounted the challenge to their ill-conceived support of  the millage proposal. At the December 2nd BOE meeting after the millage failed, Treasurer Randy Friedman (who made a rare appearance) lecturered those millage opponents present that, “There’s an expression in retail: If you break it, you own it. I’m glad that A2crss.org has made tangible for the community the identity of those, who through their misinformed opposition to the millage created the mess we are in.”

The millage opponents created the mess the BOE is in? Misinformed opposition? Hardly. The Ann Arbor Board of Education members had no plan to restructure the District so as to address the financial problems for the long term.

Instead, as Tony Dearing wrote in an editorial in AnnArbor.com, “Given what’s at stake, we wish we could join those who support this ballot proposal, but we can’t endorse it in its current form. We think it asks too much money for too many years, without an accompanying plan for structural changes needed to make our schools stronger, more efficient and more successful in the long run. This is, ultimately, not a ‘enhancement’ millage. It’s a status quo millage that would help shelter districts from the funding cuts that are buffeting them.”

Dearing, with his “divisive” opinions and lack of “support for the administration” would, alas, be viewed as an unwelcome addition to the Ann Arbor Board of Education by the current poltiboro. 

The current BOE members have a wonderful working relationship without “divisiveness.” Unfortunately, the only people that like-mindedness has benefitted have been the board members themselves. They covered up for Randy Friedman, their friend, and neglected to uncover the truth about District finances. The most productive boards are comprised of members who can, when opinions vary, listen objectively, and with the best interests of those whom the board represents always at the forefront of the decision-making process. The current AABOE members, in supporting a huge millage hike rather than routinely negotiating teacher contracts and budgeting in ways that reflected the half-a-decade old structural deficit are, and should be, held completely responsible for the current financial mess the District is in. 


Popularity: 25% [?]

December 3, 2009

The Politics of Reform: A2Politico Finds Love (At Last), or at Least Lust

VN:F [1.9.3_1094]
Rate this posting
Rating: 5.0/5 (6 votes cast)

Not that kind of love, silly. Political love—or at least serious political lust. I’m not throwing over Democratic candidate for governor Alma Wheeler Smith for any anti-choice candidate. Republican Mike Bouchard is anti-choice, and Republican Rick Snyder slurped up the endorsement of Jerry Zandstra, president of Pro-Life Federation of Michigan. Snyder, in a July 2009 interview with the Detroit Free Press described himself as a “… pro-life, pro-family Republican.” Anti-choice politicos never, ever get my vote. I can, however, look beyond their medieval political opinions on a woman’s right to choose, and in Mike Bouchard’s case, I think it would behoove the Democrats running for governor to take a close and careful look at Bouchard’s latest set of proposed reforms. 

On November 30th, Republican Mike Bouchard proposed a set of sweeping state reforms (many of which would require Michigan voters to call a Constitutional convention in 2010). It’s a minor detail. Really. Well, not really, since voters have an opportunity to call a Constitutional convention only every 16 years, but Bouchard just moved to the head of the class so far as I’m concerned with his proposed reforms.

Let me digress before I tell you about his ideas, and tell you about a convo I had with a friend the other day. We were discussing the totally lame-o reason that Representative Rebekah Warren is going around town telling people why she wants to move into the Michigan State Senate. According to Warren, the Republican-controlled Senate is constantly thwarting the legislative efforts of those progressive Dems in the Michigan House. Dems proffer perfectly progressive bills to the Senate, and those Republican SOBs just won’t play ball and pass them. The bills, Warren explains, just die. She wants to go to the Michigan State Senate to change all that.

(Yes, I’m rolling my eyes. It’s not nice, but Warren is taking the electorate for a bunch of naive hoo-hahs.)

The seat she’s going for has been held by Democrat Liz Brater since Hector was a pup. Replacing Brater with another Democrate isn’t really going to up the chances of getting those House bills passed in the Senate. Perhaps what Warren is not saying is that she’s planning to use mind control, or extortion to get the Republicans to vote her way?  Her reason for running is lame. 

Then there’s County Commissioner Mark Ouimet, the totally closeted Republican in the hunt for Democrat Pam Byrnes’s 52nd District House seat. This is why Ouimet is running (from his web site): 

“Michigan is at a critical crossroad. Decisions we make today will affect our families for generations to come.  Now more than ever, our district, our region, and our state need strong, focused leadership to help Michigan reclaim its position as the region’s powerhouse. That’s why I’m running to be our next state Representative.”

Focused leadership? Were the rest of the legislators in Lansing not paying close enough attention? Was Pam Byrnes napping on the job? 

Mark Ouimet is running on his “service” as a board member at Ann Arbor SPARK. You see, he’d like to take SPARK’s “successes” to Lansing. Three guesses how he got that SPARK Board gig? If you guessed political cronyism, you get a prize. Choose any board or commission in town and A2Politico will make sure you get selected to serve. (I’ll use mind control.) SPARK is a boondoggle and Ouimet sits on the board of the boondoggle and watches the boondoggle shake its public money-taker. He wants to take all those “good ideas” for economic growth to Lansing. He’ll be taking a large supply of Kool-Aid for everyone to drink with him, as well, I imagine.

Lame.

Why is 53rd District House candidate Jeff Irwin running? “He said he wants to bring progressive ideas to Lansing and put Michigan back on track,” according to his launch press release posted to AnnArbor.com.

What does the code “progressive ideas” mean? Can someone please translate that?  

Lamer.

How about Ned Staebler, the other candidate for the 53rd District House seat? Why’s he in the race? This is from his launch press release posted to AnnArbor.com:

“I ran because I don’t believe that things in Michigan are currently headed in the right direction…I think that it’s time for a new generation of leaders to take a stand and help Michigan get back on track. Unfortunately, right now we have deep and structural problems that will require commitment in order to ensure long-term solutions. I think that I’m part of that generation that can make that change.”

A new generation of leaders? He and Rebekah Warren are from the same generation. Vote for Staebler and we’ll replace a 30-something, white, upper middle-class woman with a 30-something, white, upper middle-class man. That’s a generational, racial and socio-economic shift? Hardly.

Lamest.

Lame. Lame. Lame. When did elected officials forget that they were not Captains America and Wonder Women? 

These Ann Arbor politicos need to give us all a break, because the political bull-shit-o-meter is way off the charts. Warren, Staebler, Irwin, and Ouimet fancy themselves Marvel comic book characters. They (pow!) will go to that cesspool Lansing (crunch!) and using their progressive power rays (zap), and “focus,” they will single-handedly come up with solutions (smash!) to all of the state’s problems. Here’s the truth: Staebler, Irwin, Ouimet and Warren are running because they want jobs in politics in Lansing. Of the lot of them, I think Irwin has spoken the most sincerely about service to his constituents and his desire to continue serving the people in Lansing. 

As I said to my friend at lunch, I wish, for once, a local politico would just come right out and tell the damn truth: “I like being popular. I enjoy wielding my political power. I want a job. I need a job. These State House and Senate jobs pay really well, have great benefits, prestige, life-time pensions and perks galore.” Better the ugly truth than all these beautiful lies.

A state lawmaker who spends just six years in Lansing will earn somewhere around $500,000 in salary, plus money for retirement. He/she will also get health care for life. For life. I feel so generous—well not really. I actually feel so used, so plainly taken advantage of as a taxpayer.

Here’s where Republican Mike Bouchard comes in. On November 30th, he got some serious game and came out with some excellent ideas to reform Lansing. These reforms would, I think, change the reasons people run for these offices, and I hope, attract a different class of person to political service in Lansing. Some real socio-economic, and racial diversity would do the State Legislature a world of good. So here’s what Bouchard is pitching:

• Reduce the full-time Legislature to part-time, meeting 120 days every other year. Most states have a part-time legislature.
• Eliminate health insurance and pensions for legislators. The state would set up health care savings accounts for them, he said.
• Lower legislative term limits from 14 years to 12 years but allow a lawmaker to serve up to 12 years in either the House or the Senate. Currently, House members are limited to three two-year terms and Senators are limited to two four-year terms.
• Install a two-year rolling budget plan. For every day after May 15 that the budget is not in place, the governor and legislators would be docked a day’s pay.

I love these ideas (mostly)!

Get rid of the health insurance for life-o-rama and pensions for Michigan legislators? Absolutely. Those are hold-over bennies from when our legislators could serve as many terms as they could get elected to serve. Representative Pam Byrnes shouldn’t get a pension for serving six years in the House. Liz Brater shouldn’t get one, either. Michigan taxpayers shouldn’t have to give Rebekah Warren and her family health insurance for the statistical 45 years she and hubby County Commissioner Conan Smith will live after Warren leaves the State Senate (provided she even gets there).

A part-time legislature! Yes. Yes. Yes. Maybe not every other year, but part-time is definitely a great idea, and is how many states get the work of governing done. May I add an amendment? How about a unicameral legislature? Cut the number of politicos in the legislature by, say, one-third? Save 30 percent of the cost of supporting them in the manner to which they’ve all become accustomed. Oh, and while we’re at the Constitutional convention, let’s roll back their salaries to the median income of the state, shall we? Jeff Irwin would earn $47,950 as opposed to $80,000. (The median income for a family of 4 in Michigan is $47,950.) 

Term-limits? I like his idea of allowing legislators to serve the entire time in either the House or the Senate, but not the idea of lowering the total amount of time legislators can serve. There’s too much turn-over as it is, and it’s costing us in legislative experience and brain drain. 

Roll out the budget? Go on with your bad self, Mickey B. Not a single other candidate for governor has made this suggestion. Rolling budgets (also known as continuous budgeting) mean more flexibility and better opportunities to track income and expenses. It is a method of budgeting in which as each month passes, an additional budget month is added such that there is always a 12-month budget. Rolling budgets are tracked more closely, managed more carefully and amended continuously to reflect changes in financial circumstances. Sound familiar? Yep, that’s exactly how most taxpayers manage their own budgets, as well. The little people manage our money all the time to reflect expenses and income that crop up as the year progresses. Our legislators obviously need to do the same thing.

I like Bouchard’s concrete idea to get a firm grasp on revenues and expenses. Such a change would keep legislators focused on income and expenses as they set policy and fund their projects.

What do you think, fellow A2 politicos? Any of Bouchard’s suggestions for reform resonate with you?

Popularity: 25% [?]

December 1, 2009

The Politics of Commentary: Republican Blogger Throws Down With Washtenaw County Board

VN:F [1.9.3_1094]
Rate this posting
Rating: 4.6/5 (8 votes cast)

In January of 2009, County Commissioner Conan Smith, Chair of the Ann Arbor Democratic Party Club, and son of State Representative Alma Wheeler-Smith, was re-elected to the Washtenaw County Board of Commissioners as one of the four Ann Arbor representatives. In his very first act as a newly elected public official, and as the newly elected Chair of the County’s Ways & Means Committee (the Committee where the Commissioners decide how to spend the $190,000,000 dollars in tax and fee money they are given by the county’s 347,000 residents, Smith moved to “adjust” some of the Board’s rules and regulations.

More exactly, Conan Smith moved to cut the time alloted to each individual who addressed the Ways & Means Committee to three minutes, down from five minutes. He also proposed that the board require that individuals who comment during Ways & Means meetings comment only on agenda items. With the exception of County Commissioners Jeff Irwin (now a candidate for the 53rd District House seat) and Roland Sizemore, the rest of the County Commissioners (all of whom serve on the Ways & Means Committee), went right along with Smith’s “adjustment.” 

Before Smith proposed curtailing the public’s time and speech, there had never been any such limitations. Conan Smith told the Press “his goal was to make the meetings more efficient, and that the public still had the opportunity to speak before the entire board with no change in the current time limit or topic rules.” Since few people ever go to the County Board of Commissioners’ meetings, let alone speak at them, Conan Smith’s professed desire to increase efficiency was a crock…of well pickled sauerkraut.

Conan Smith went on to be quoted in the Press as saying that he “believes citizens should be treated more like staff, and that he would be willing to allocate them even more than 5 minutes if they contacted him before the meeting, and if it were appropriate to the agenda.” Citizens, alas, are not Conan’s Smith’s staff. We don’t work for elected officials such as County Commissioners; Conan Smith and the other Commissioners work for us.

When I initially read about the rule changes, I found Smith’s comments shocking in their arrogance and astounding in their clear lack of understanding of the place and minor part he plays as an elected official. To say that he would consider allotting citizens more speaking time provided he approved of citizens’ topics/comments beforehand is as illegal as it is undemocratic and plainly egotistical. The only other thing I found more shocking was that the local press that covered the meeting wrote nothing about the overt misuse of power by Conan Smith and those County Commissioners who voted along with him. Why a misuse of power? 

Those in the know refer to Smith’s proposed and passed rule changes as the “Tom Patridge” rule. Tom Patridge? He’s a royal pain in ascot to just about every local politico who has ever had to sit through his comments at meetings. At Ann Arbor City Council meetings, he’s a citizen who exercises his right to speak regularly and often repetitively at various public meetings of elected officials. Conan Smith proposed the rule change, and it was adopted by those County Commissioners to thwart Tom Partridge’s penchant for berating them about (in his opinion) their pitiful records on issues such as homelessness, supportive services, disability services and, well, let’s just say items not appearing on “the agenda.” 

AnnArborChronicle.com noted the rules changes in a piece posted to the site in early-January 2009. The site also noted County Commissioner Jeff Irwin’s comments that citizens should be able to come before the Commissioners and read the phonebook, if they so chose. That the AnnArborChronicle.com reporter accepted Smith’s obviously ridiculous explanation concerning his proposed rule changes without question is exactly why local politicos such as Conan Smith come to believe they are entitled to treat their staff (the public) with disdain and disrespect. The message of Smith’s rule change was clear: “We don’t want to listen to the rabble, and we don’t have to do it if we don’t want to.”

Well, as the saying goes, revenge is a dish best served cold. 

Enter local blogger (and Republican) Janelle Baranowski. On November 19th, she posted an entry to her site in which she writes about her attendance at the Washtenaw County Board of Commissioners‘ meeting. She begins,

“An old man with a cane hobbled up to the microphone and began a (somewhat) coherent speech on the plight of the homeless in the County and his request that the Board proceed quickly with the budget approval. At three minutes, Commissioner Conan Smith called time and the man hobbled back to his chair. It was what happened during those three minutes that boiled my blood.

“As soon as the gentleman stood, nearly every member of the Board turned to their neighbor and began (what looked like) personal conversations. With the exception of a few moments searching in her purse, Commissioner Kristin Judge appeared to be the only person paying the least bit of attention.

“During this time, I couldn’t help but remember the 20 minutes I spent listening as several Board members waxed poetic on their hard work creating the budget, the difficulties they faced, and how grateful they were to each other and the County staff for accomplishing the daunting task. The whole time I remember thinking, ‘Wouldn’t a personalized thank you note be a little less self-serving and a little more meaningful?’”

Yep. Baranowski, who was watching the meeting without any knowledge of the backstory about Tom Patridge, was describing the behavior of the County Commissioners as Tom Patridge spoke. 

Baranowski goes on to write in her entry, “Realizing that no one else planned to comment, I immediately approached the Board and introduced myself. I mentioned that I was happy to see that they troubled themselves to actually look at me, given that earlier they were too busy chatting to listen. I was sure to point out the separate twosomes to assure them I had paid attention to their behavior. Chastising them for their rudeness, I said it was disgraceful that they couldn’t pay attention for three minutes and that as representatives, all citizens deserve their respect.”

It’s exactly what the local reporters who’ve been covering the Washtenaw County Commission meetings should have done, but never did because getting quotes from the local politerati County Commissioners is way cooler than pissing them off by writing about their stifling of free speech, and their horrid treatment of a citizen, even one they consider a royal pain in the butter bell.

Now Baranowski’s blog entry gets really interesting. She writes:

“Needless to say, many of the Commissioners spoke with me after the meeting was adjourned. First up was Conan Smith. He explained that while he understood the nature of my comments, he wanted to put some context behind the Board’s behavior. To paraphrase the conversation:

“He explained that the gentleman comments at every opportunity, at every single meeting.
My response: So? That’s his right. He [Smith] then explained that the gentleman has slandered both him and his wife in the past, as well as other Board members (sadly, no specific examples were provided.) My response: He did not do anything like that tonight. His comments were about the homeless and the budget.

“Comm. Smith then asked me for my opinion on the limits of free speech.”

The limits of free speech? Conan Smith, with his B.A. in creative writing, is not an expert in anything except writing about free speech creatively. He obviously put forth the rule changes to deter Tom Patridge from speaking, and when a fresh set of eyes (Baranowski’s) took in the disrespectful behavior of the County Commissioners, we finally saw that Emperor Conan Smith was as naked as the day he was born.

Janelle Baranowski has a plan: “I plan on annoying the heck out of the Ways and Means Committee. From now on, I plan on speaking for three minutes about whatever comes to mind. I plan on using the three minutes at the beginning and end of the meeting to become more annoying than Mr. Partridge. I hope they will breathe a sigh of relief when he approaches the microphone….It’s easy for them to push around the old (slightly nutty) guy. But no more. Not on my watch. Because this is No OK. I’ll do my best to be at every meeting until Mr. Partridge get’s to rant for three minutes to his heart’s content. Because it is his RIGHT.”

It’s our right to speak before the County Board. When Conan Smith brought forward the rule changes, the county corporation counsel, Mr. Hedger, suggested the rule changes might run head-on into free speech issues. Obviously, no one on the County Board directed the lawyer to research the question, and issue a formal opinion. Rather than see a citizen sue the County to find out whether Smith’s rule changes are illegal, the Washtenaw County Commissioners (one of whom has launched his bid to serve in the State House of Representatives in the 52nd District [Commissioner Mark Ouimet]) should reverse Conan’s Smith’s foray into the political pool of Narcissus. The County Board should return public commentary at Ways & Means to five minutes. No holds barred.

When Tom Patridge speaks, the County Commissioners can pay attention for five minutes, or they can take their political marbles and go home. As for Conan Smith, our Ann Arbor County Commissioner with a taste for $800 hotel rooms on the taxpayer dime, while the county struggles under a $30 million dollar deficit, he should go back to writing creatively. Politicians with a taste for stifling freedom of speech to suit themselves, and to keep their wives (State Representative Rebekah Warren) from being “slandered,” are generally found in small South American countries, not parading as progressive Democrats in Ann Arbor.  

Here’s a thought: in August 2010, when Ann Arbor County Commissioner Conan Smith comes up for re-election, if he runs, his “staff” should send him back to the Suburbs Alliance from whence he came. There, as Executive Director, he can limit the speech of all who work for him to his heart’s desire.

Popularity: 40% [?]

November 27, 2009

Weekend Poll: Next on Channel 16—”Surprise” Homelessness in A2 and Washtenaw County

VN:F [1.9.3_1094]
Rate this posting
Rating: 4.8/5 (4 votes cast)

“Emergency funding” of social service programs always reminds me of those television shows one can always find late at night on the better cable channels about “surprise” pregnancies. You know the premise. The woman goes for nine months suspecting nothing then, suddenly, usually in some crazy locale, say, an amusement park, she gives birth to…..a baby! Zounds! She never even suspected she was pregnant. The nausea was “the flu,” and the unrelenting heartburn was caused by “spicy food.” The pregnancy was a complete shock, and the emergency birth of the baby an astounding revelation.

Homelessness in Washtenaw County and Ann Arbor is kinda like one of those “surprise” pregnancies. Who knew it was such a problem? Who could have guessed? All those foreclosures? Just a little gas.

The Mayor of Ann Arbor, as well as the ten members of City Council were recently shocked and amazed to discover that homelessness in Ann Arbor is a problem. The Four Ann Arbor County Commissioners of the Apocalypse, Jeff Irwin (53rd District House wanna-be), Leah Gunn, Barbara Bergman and Conan Smith were equally shocked and astounded to discover homelessness in Washtenaw County is up, up, up. At the moment, three thousand people have no place to hang their hats, rest their heads or shelter themselves in Washtenaw County. Talk about heartburn and nausea….

In Ann Arbor, funding to address homelessness over the course of the past two budget cycles has been cut, slashed and dismembered more times than a teen girl in a Wes Craven film. One of Mayor and veteran Ann Arbor City Council members’ best tricks has been to “cut” human services funding from the city’s budget in committee, only to “save” it later, when the proposed budget was presented to Council. Departed Third Ward Council member Leigh Greden called such maneuvers “scripting” outcomes. All of his pals on the Budget and Labor Committee played right along. Here’s the really evil part of the trick. Human services funding was “returned” to the budget, yes, but with nary an increase in funding. So for the past four years, the funding levels remained frozen as the need grew increasingly acute.

Thus, November’s “emergency” allocations to deal with the homelessness “emergency” in Ann Arbor and Washtenaw County. The funds allocated by both Ann Arbor City Council and the Washtenaw County Board of Commissioners provided shelter to a fraction of the 3,000 people in need. (The County financed shelter for 10 families, and the City allocation bought 60 more beds.) The “emergency” funding still leaves the majority of the homeless out in the cold, literally.

Over the past 4 years, Ann Arbor has built just 15 new units of affordable housing per year. The Chair of the Ann Arbor Housing and Human Services Board (the other 53rd District House wanna-be, Ned Staebler) told City Council, “This [Ann Arbor] is not the kind of place where we let people freeze to death on the streets.” Since 2007, he has been the Chair of the city’s Housing and Human Services Board. Staebler’s Board advises City Council on the “needs of the city’s low income residents.” Evidently, adequate housing and a significant bump in the number of shelter spaces were not among the pressing needs of low income residents in Ann Arbor this year. Or last year. Or the year before that one. 

As a result of Ned Staebler’s ability to ignore bloating, swollen ankles, weight gain, gas, nausea and heartburn, coupled with City Council’s fiscal and political machinations, alas, Ann Arbor has become the kind of place where we will let people freeze to death in the streets. 

So here’s the question: Is something better than nothing when it comes to funding shelter for the homeless? 

Popularity: 21% [?]

November 4, 2009

Washtenaw County Commissioners to County Residents: Voting on New Taxes Is For Pantywaists

VN:F [1.9.3_1094]
Rate this posting
Rating: 5.0/5 (4 votes cast)

On November 3rd, Washtenaw County residents refused to fund a new millage for the Sacred Cow of K-12 education. The earth shook, and the sounds of wailing from county school board trustees could be heard in Calcutta. 

Seems some people, alas, weren’t paying attention in class.

On November 3rd, tens of thousands of county residents told the trustees of 10 school boards in the County, as well as the trustees of the WISD, not to mention the celebrity line-up of local politicos who backed the $130,000,000 tax hike for “the kids,” to go fluff their auras. Voters told school officials and their political allies who endorsed the millage (including Ann Arbor County Commissioners Smith, Gunn and Irwin) that it was not the moment for a tax hike. 

The very next day, the French aristocrats on the Washtenaw County Board of Commissioners got together for a rollicking  ”Let Them Eat Cake” party and went right ahead and imposed a new property tax. County Administrator Robert Guenzel is busy printing up t-shirts: “Real Men Impose Their Property Taxes. Voter Approval is for Pantywaists.” The t-shirts may be purchased at many of the local Ann Arbor restaurants where Bobbie G. holds staff meetings, or at Ann Arbor SPARK’s headquarters.  

Ann Arbor’s four monarchists on the Washtenaw County Commissioners Barbara Bergman, Leah Gunn, Jeff Irwin (currently in the hunt for the 53rd District House seat), and Conan Smith provided half of the eight votes cast in order to impose the new property tax—an Act 88 Millage—to fund economic development and agricultural activities. The tax is expected to raise $608,000 from Washtenaw County residents. It’s a small tax. Tiny. Hardly noticeable. It’s certainly not the $30 million per year the WISD would have raised. So what’s the problem? It’s the principle of the maneuver, or rather the lack of principles associated with the maneuver to which I object. 

The new millage will provide $200,000 for Ann Arbor SPARK; $50,000 for SPARK East; $100,000 for the Eastern Leaders Group; $59,000 for 4-H activities; $27,000 for Horticulture Programming; $15,000 for Agricultural Innovation; $15,000 for the Food Systems Economic Partnership; and $137,000 for the county’s Department of Economic Development and Energy activities.

Commissioners Kristin Judge and Wesley Prater voted against the new tax. Meanwhile, Ann Arbor’s four County Commissioners demonstrated their deep commitment to funding agricultural programs from the Act 88 Millage created in 1913 to fund agricultural activities. They voted to give the County’s 4-H program a generous $59,000, and made their political pals at the various economic development boondoggles get by with only $349,000 tax dollars. Foreclosures in Ann Arbor just recently hit the double digits, Michigan is in the top ten states with the most foreclosures in the nation, but the four A2 Commissioners supported the new tax to fund not only “economic development,” but to feed the gaping maw of the county’s own bureaucracy in the form of the Department of Economic Development and Energy Activities

Pouring tax dollars into public-private “economic development” schemes without independent measurement of the progress of said economic development programs is like pouring water into sand on a beach. One rarely reaches the saturation point. Ever. The real problem is that when local politicos actually demonstrate due diligence and gently enquire after the taxpayers’ money poured into outfits such as SPARK, we discover that the Economic Development Emperor has no clothes. In April of 2009  Richard King, Chair of the LDFA, told Council members that without LDFA funding the 600 jobs SPARK officials take credit for creating over the past three years would have been created anyway. (The LDFA is a City Council-appointed committee that oversees the capture of the property tax money from Ann Arbor’s downtown development district that is funneled to SPARK.)

According to this piece, in the Ann Arbor Business Review, Google rode into town in 2006 promising to create 1,000 jobs by 2011. I actually think some local politicos got so excited by Google’s sexy talk of job creation, the boys had to stay seated during the press conference. Google greedily slurped up tax incentives from the state. Ann Arbor taxpayers footed the bill to have SPARK staff help Google officials find office space in downtown Ann Arbor. Taxpayers also paid to have SPARK staff wipe Google noses and cut their food, as Google executives were obviously incapable of taking care of their own real estate searches and physical needs. To sweeten the deal, taxpayers gave Google up to 400 parking spaces free of charge until 2010 in a nearby parking structure. Listen to Mayor Hieftje on the subject, and he’ll tell you Ann Arbor can’t get companies to locate to downtown without giving away spaces in our publicly owned parking garages. 

In March of 2009, Google axed 200 workers in its sales and marketing division. Today, the head of Google won’t discuss hiring plans for the Ann Arbor office. However, a recent piece in the Detroit News reported that Google has created a mere 204 jobs in A2. Local writer Nathan Bomey writes in a March 26, 2009 piece, “But the acknowledgement today that it has committed too many resources to sales functions marks a significant blow to Ann Arbor’s hopes of securing major employment growth via the search engine king.”

SPARK officials spin Google as a SPARK “success story.” The truth is that Google is a perfect example of why it’s irresponsible for elected officials to waste public tax dollars to attract business to Ann Arbor, and why the Washtenaw County Board of Commissioners should never have imposed a new tax to fund “economic development.”

Here’s another Google-in-the-making: This comes from the SPARK web site: MEDC, Ann Arbor SPARK, ETCS, MDIT and EMU have collaborated to bring Systems In Motion to the Ann Arbor area. ”Systems In Motion, a Silicon Valley-based IT services firm has chosen to locate a new support center in the Ann Arbor region. Venture-backed Systems In Motion combines the best practices of global service delivery, with strategic investments in intellectual capital and assets built for next generation technology architectures. Systems In Motion will create 1,085 new jobs in the Ann Arbor region over the next five years. Additionally, the company will invest over $15 million in capital.” 

Sound familiar? 

Ann Arbor’s County Commissioners, then, just voted to impose a new property tax to give tax dollars to SPARK and SPARK East to help the organizations continue with the important work—of creating high-paying jobs for those who work at the economic development outfits. The LDFA’s contract with Spark was for $872,836 during the audited 2007-08 year. $872,836 dollars to create no jobs which would have not otherwise been created. Michael Finney, the CEO of SPARK earns $200K per year plus benefits. In May of 2009, City Council voted to strip Project Grow of its funding. The very next month, the Council voted on a resolution sponsored by Second Ward Council member and LDFA Board member Stephen Rapundalo and Fourth Ward Council member Marcia Higgins, to increase the LDFA’s budget by $25,000.

I seriously doubt that county voters would have approved Robert’s Guenzel’s Act 88 Millage scheme had it come before them on the ballot November 3rd, alongside the WISD millage “enhancement.” Then again, Real Men Impose Their Millages, Sweetie.

Hell, there’s something to admire in a guy who can convince eight elected officials to spit into the faces of 347,000 county taxpayers so he can fund a new county department, and keep tax dollars flowing to his buddies at the “economic development” boondoggles.

Popularity: 20% [?]

October 30, 2009

It Takes A Lit Drop, Celebrities and Kissing Some Serious Voter Bee-hind to Win/Defeat A Millage

VN:F [1.9.3_1094]
Rate this posting
Rating: 4.7/5 (3 votes cast)

I don’t think I would be betraying any great secret by telling you that if you were to buy the list of the 6,800 or so 100 percent (aka regular) voters in Ann Arbor, you’d find A2Politico’s name on that list. It’s like the political Mensa Club, the top 6 percent of the voting stock in Ann Arbor. We aren’t geniuses, per se, but rather inordinately capable of locating our polling places and remembering the dates of local elections. Perhaps a better analogy would be to say the 6,800 of the us are the political Rain Men. Local politicos know the odds are very good we’ll go to the polls and cast our votes one way or the other. 

That why we get the lit drops. If you’re a candidate or group that’s going to spend $14,000-$16,000 printing up and mailing out glossy 8.5″ x 5.5″ cards, you want your lit to go to someone who will read the darn thing, think about your pitch, and (please God, please) go to the polls and vote (for you, your millage, your Charter amendment, etc….)

Today, I received not one but two pieces of literature about the WISD millage proposal. My first reaction is that McKinley CEO, and Citizens for a Responsible Washtenaw Treasurer, Albert Berriz, has money to burn. Well, he kinda does. The Ann Arbor Citizens Millage Committee has money to burn, as well. Today’s was my third mailing from that group. The proponents for the millage have the local celebs pitching for the five-year $150,000,000 “enhancement” tax.

The front of that group’s mailer is clever. There were my name, address and then a three column list of supporters of the millage. I perused the list. I saw the principal of the tot’s school along with a veritable local politico-a-palooza: State Senator Liz Brater, State Representatives Alma Wheeler-Smith, Pam Byrnes and Rebekah Warren, Ann Arbor County Commissioners Jeff Irwin, Conan Smith, and Leah Gunn and Demublican Second Ward City Council member Tony Derezinski. Alas, I’m not the kind of voter who gives a rat’s bahookie about whether or not local politicos endorse anything, particularly a tax hike.

I saw several of these same politicos (Brater and Gunn, for example) enthusiastically endorse soon to be ex-Third Ward City Council member Leigh Greden’s run for re-election in this past August primary election. Endorsement doxies among the local politicos in Ann Arbor have succeeded in undermining the whole endorsement process city-wide. I have this sinking feeling that several of these local politicos listed as supporters of the millage proposal would endorse Satan as “a long-time friend and colleague. He has worked hard and produced results for the citizens of Ann Arbor, without publicity and fanfare. Satan has earned my endorsement for his re-election, and I urge you to vote for him.”

Interestingly, Second Ward’s other Demublican City Council member, Stephen Rapundalo, has given his endorsement to the group opposing the millage.

Here’s a little cheat sheet about how much money the various groups are putting up for and against the millage proposal:

Campaign finance records show opponents of a countywide schools enhancement millage are outspending supporters of the proposal by a bundle, nearly $30,000.

Groups Against the Millage:
Citizens for Responsible Washtenaw, Treasurer, Albert BerrizMcKinley Real Estate CEO: $75,000

Berriz was quoted in a piece on AnnArbor.com as explaining his $75K investment thusly: “I’m very passionate,” about the issue, he said. “I am confident that this millage will not address the financial structural issues of the schools.” Berriz has called on school leaders to improve the transparency of the schools’ finances.  “I love Ann Arbor schools,” he said. “But it’s my obligation is to say things candidly.”

Well, kinda. Berriz’s McKinley company owns 6.2 million square feet commercial property. of The proposed millage would hit McKinley with a big tax hike. I’d be saying things just as candidly as Albie B. if I owned that much commercial property, and I’d be saying it on the radio and mailing multiple lit drops. 

Citizens for Responsible Washtenaw: $4,705.

Citizens for Responsible School Spending: filed a campaign finance report waiver saying it intended to raise and spend under $1,000.

Groups In Favor of the Millage:

It won’t come as a shock that the funds for mailings, robo-calls and other on-the-ground work is coming from the people whom the millage would benefit directly, school administrators, teachers and school board members.

Ann Arbor Administrator Association: $5,000.

Citizens Millage Committee: The Ann Arbor group has raised $23,361 in contributions from Ann Arbor residents. The committee has $10,433 left to spend.

Friends of Education: This group, based in Dexter, has raised $21,654 and has $9,860 left to spend.

Popularity: 19% [?]

October 12, 2009

Mayor Tells A2 Affordable Housing Virgins His 3-Inch Accomplishment Is A 9-Inch Beauty

VN:F [1.9.3_1094]
Rate this posting
Rating: 4.9/5 (10 votes cast)

There was a frost last night. Time to light the furnace and stack the firewood. 

Did you know that there are, currently, 800 homeless people (individuals and families) in Ann Arbor? According to the handy fact sheet prepared by the University of Michigan Homeless Empowerment Relationship Organization (UHERO), a university student group, on average there are between 2000-3000 homeless people in Washtenaw County, one-third of whom are children. That represents the equivalent of the entire student population of Tappan Middle School. About one-quarter of the homeless are mentally ill, the rest are homeless for a variety of other reasons. The numbers continue to rise, thanks to the economy.

At the October 10th meeting of the Ann Arbor City Democratic Party, held jointly with the University of Michigan College Democrats (shout out to Sam Marvin, senior, and Chair of the College Dems), Ann Arbor City Democratic Party Vice Chair for Programs, Lou Glorie, arranged a presentation on homelessness for the almost 70 people at the meeting. The group included Mayor Hietfje, nine City Council members, Ward Three Council Member-elect Steve Kunselman, state Representative Rebekah Warren, who recently launched her campaign to run for state Senator Liz Brater’s seat (Warren is also the wife of AADem Chair, Conan Smith), and Ned Staebler—he’s running for Warren’s 53rd House District seat.

The alignment of the politico stars was interesting. Representative Warren sat in the back row, presumably to get a good view of the crowd. Ned Staebler stood in the back, as well. Andy Labarre, assistant to U.S. Rresentative John Dingell, stood at the side of the room. Most of the Ann Arbor Council members stood glowering in the back of the room, propping up the walls, whispering to one another, arms crossed. They stayed apart from the rest of the Dems in attendance, perhaps afraid to have to sit amid the rabble? Two exceptions to that sad display of haughty elitism: First Ward Council member Sabra Briere, ever the good student, sat in the front row, near some First Ward constituents. Briere participated in the debates, unlike the Council sweathogs in the back of the classroom. Third Ward’s Steve Kunselman sat in the audience, as well, near Third Ward constituents. 

On the agenda, Chair Conan Smith had placed the presentation on homelessness after several proposed (and contentious) changes to the group’s bylaws. When a motion was made to allow the guests to present their talk prior to the bylaws discussions, it was voted down. Bylaws before homelessness. By the time the group reached the presentation on homelessness, Sam Marvin and his College Dems had left the room. They were driving across the state to go door-to-door for a Dem candidate. Second Ward Council member Tony Derezinski nipped out right in the middle of the presentation about homelessness in Ann Arbor. He was not alone, of course, by the time homelessness was the topic of discussion, most of our elected City Council members had walked out of the meeting. Homelessness, evidently, isn’t a compelling enough political  issue to keep Second Ward Council members Stephen Rapundalo, and Tony Derezinski, First Ward Council member  Sandi Smith, Fifth Ward Council member Carsten Hohnke, Third Ward Council members Chris Taylor and Leigh Greden, or Mayor Pro Tem and Fourth Ward Council member Marcia Higgins engaged.  

Mayor Hieftje and Sabra Briere stayed. 

Here’s what Hieftje announced to the 30 or so remaining people in the room after the presentation on homelessness: 

Ann Arbor has 60 more units of affordable housing for the homeless than the city did in 2005. That’s a commitment to affordable housing for low-income residents of Ann Arbor and the homeless? Sixty units added over five years?  Since 2005, about 1,000 units of condo/student housing stock have been built in our city.

In Berkeley, California, City Council there passed a resolution years ago that requires 20 percent of all new housing built in the city to be affordable. Check out the most recent half a dozen projects that brought over 300 units of affordable housing to Berkeley’s homeless and low-income residents (seniors, included) over the past two years. In addition, that city has five times (250) the number of beds available for the homeless that Ann Arbor has. Unlike Ann Arbor, Boulder, Colorado, Madison, Wisconsin and Berkeley, California each have multi-million dollar affordable housing Trust Funds. In Ann Arbor, money to fund affordable housing is a line item in the General Fund budget subject to the whim and fiscal ineptitude of Mayor and Council.

If Council had established such a Trust Fund three years ago, and funded it with the money allocated from the General Fund to Ann Arbor’s LDFA, which in turn, gives the money to Ann Arbor SPARK, the Trust Fund would have over $3.5 million dollars in it now. Throw in the money the Downtown Development Authority has given away to developers through its “Partnership” program, and Ann Arbor could have a $4.5 million dollar affordable housing Trust Fund right now. Split the DDA’s currently budgeted TIF capture with an affordable housing Trust Fund, and the Fund would grow by $1.98 million dollars this year. The money is there. It’s the political flesh that’s weak. 

The Mayor then stopped patting his own back to pat the backs of Council members Briere and Smith, with whom he “is working” “to double” that 60 units. In another five years? He didn’t say. Sabra Briere didn’t say, either. Sandi Smith couldn’t say because she was long gone.  

Our Mayor has been in office since 2000, and to crow in public about the construction of 60 units of affordable housing “for the homeless” over the course of five years qualifies as a political Carnie Call to get folks into the tent to see the Incredible, the Amazing, the Astounding, the 3-inch Accomplishments of John Hieftje. Councilmembers Sabra Briere and Sandi Smith are sitting inside Hieftje’s Carnival tent collecting tickets from the rubes and praise from the turnips who have no idea that 60 units of affordable housing over five years would get the lot of them burned in effigy in towns like Boulder or Berkeley. According to the City of Ann Arbor’s own 2005-2009 strategic plan to address the lack of affordable housing: “What should the community look like in 2010? 500 plus new units of supportive housing for under 50% AMI.”  

Ann Arbor doesn’t have a Department of Housing, as do Boulder and Berekley. We do have  the Housing and Human Services Advisory Board. Here’s the mission of the Board: “The HHSAB provides policy direction to the City Council and the Office of Community Development on housing and human service needs of low income residents of the City.” Here’s a tip to the Board’s lucky 13 Mayoral disciples (including First Ward Council member Sandi Smith and Second Ward Council member Stephen Rapundalo): Yo, IMHO, the lot of you need to get your heads out of your politically-connected ascots. Look around at what other cities have accomplished since 2007, when your Board was formed, and you landed your coveted political appointments to it to advise Council on the needs of low-income residents. 

As for the Chair of that august HHSAB, that’s 53rd District State Representative wanna-be Ned Staebler (who also left prior to the presentation on homelessness at the AADem meeting). He was appointed to the Board by the Mayor in 2007. The appointment looks great on a political résumé, right?  BFOD (Big Friend of Developers, Lobbyists and Lawyers in his job at the Michigan Economic Development Corporation) gets BFOLIR (Big Friend of Low Income Residents) cred. for political résumé. Ann Arbor gets 15 units of affordable housing per year under Staebler’s leadership of the HHSAB. 

I can’t wait to see what kind of public policy direction he offers on behalf of the low-income residents of Washtenaw County, if elected. Maybe he could advise the Governor to build Staeblervilles, complete with cardboard shanties, or he could get the North Face to donate 3,000 tents for the county’s homeless.

One has to hope voters won’t be naive enough buy the Kool-Aid he’s selling and getting others, like fellow HHSAB Board member  Steve Pontoni (Chair of the Michigan Democratic Party Progressive Caucus), to sell for him, as well. He studied at the London School of Economics, but obviously never read a word Charles Dickens wrote about poverty.

As for Hieftje, I’m not a virgin, and his Accomplishment is no 9-inch beauty. As for Sandi Smith and Sabra Briere, well, it’s time the girls got out a ruler and took some careful measurements of what 9-inches really looks like.

Popularity: 20% [?]

October 9, 2009

A2, Have a Funny Feeling? It’s County Commissioner Conan Smith’s Hand in Your Pocket

VN:F [1.9.3_1094]
Rate this posting
Rating: 5.0/5 (3 votes cast)

On October 6th, just eight Washtenaw County residents voted to raise taxes for the rest of the 347,340 of us. Go ahead. Say it. WTF?!? If you’re a member of the 40-70 year-old crowd, you might feel more comfortable saying something like, “son of a bitch.” 

Yep. The Washtenaw County Commissioners’ Ways & Means Committee, Chaired by Ann Arbor District 10 Commissioner Conan Smith and Co-Chaired by Pittsfield Township Commissioner Kristin Judge (who voted against imposing the new property tax—A2Politico recently interviewed KJ here), voted to raise our property taxes without any counsel or advice from their bosses— the county’s voters. All of the county’s eleven Commissioners serve on the Ways & Means Committee. There, the elected Commissioners represent some 20 (tip o’ the keyboard to Larry Kestenbaum) county townships, as well as the cities of Ann Arbor and Ypsilanti. 

If you live in Ann Arbor, you’ll be interested to know that half of the eight votes to impose the new property tax were cast by our very own Four Commissioners of the Apocalypse—Ann Arbor County Commissioners, Jeff Irwin, Leah Gunn, Barbara Bergman, and Conan Smith. 

So how in the name of Boss Tweed did County Administrator Robert Guenzel get this Christmas present from the taxpayers? Well, Guenzel made the Commissioners an offer they couldn’t refuse: the opportunity to free up $608,000 in the county’s general fund by using a clever little law enacted in 1913 called an Act-88 millage. Under the auspices of an Act 88 millage, the county commissioners are not required to put the question of the tax increase before the voters. 

Oh, but imposing the new property tax isn’t the best part. The best part is to whom the County Commissioners voted to give our tax dollars.

Here is the text of the actual act from the State of Michigan web page:

ADVERTISEMENT OF AGRICULTURAL ADVANTAGES
Act 88 of 1913

AN ACT empowering the board of supervisors of any of the several counties of the state of Michigan to levy a special tax, or by appropriating from the general fund for the purpose of advertising the agricultural advantages of the state or for displaying the products and industries of any county in the state at domestic or foreign expositions, for the purpose of encouraging immigration and increasing trade in the products of the state, and advertising the state and any portion thereof for tourists and resorters, and to permit the boards of supervisors out of any sum so raised, or out of the general fund, to contribute all or any portion of the same to any development board or bureau to be by said board or bureau expended for the purposes herein named.

In the actual Act 88 legislation it’s agriculture first and development last.

Bob Guenzel spun Act 88 to the public and the press like this: “The tax will be levied for the first time in December and will cost property owners $4 for every $100,000 of taxable value. It will provide an alternative means of funding economic development and agricultural programs that currently rely on the county’s general fund budget for support.”

Economic development boondoggles first. Agricultural programs that educate and feed people last.

In addition, the gaping maw that is the Washtenaw County bureaucracy had to be fed: Those same eight county commissioners who voted to raise taxes without putting the question to the voters, voted to allocate $137,000 of the money generated by the new tax to fund a county Department of Economic Development and Energy. A back-door tax to feed the county bureaucracy—while the county’s unions give concessions to save their jobs.

So, where’s the majority of the $608,000 dollars raised by the Act 88 tax going, exactly? 

• $200,000 for the economic activities of Ann Arbor SPARK and $50,000 for SPARK East.

• $100,000 for the economic development activities of the Eastern Leaders Group. (Click here to read a wet-kiss-and-hip-grind-hug about his ELG political friends written by Bob Guenzel and dutifully posted by Concentrate.)

• $137,000 to fund the activities of the Department of Economic Development and Energy.

It was on September 16th when County Administrator Bob Guenzel first brought forward to the public the possibility of tapping into Act 88. At that meeting, County Commissioner Jessica Ping was quoted by the press as responding to the ACT 88 suggestion thusly: “I feel like this is full of pork.”

Jessica Ping is a woman prone to understatement.

Guenzel and the Commissioners’ use of Act 88 to fund Ann Arbor SPARK and SPARK East is a buffet of pigs’ trotters served up to their political pals. Ann Arbor SPARK is a public-private boondoggle (check out why here) launched by our very own Ann Arbor Republican candidate for governor, Rick Snyder, about whom I wrote here. SPARK East is a public-private boondoggle just east of Eden. The Eastern Leaders Group is, well, more of the same.

Those taxpayers who are warming up the tar and getting the bags of feathers ready should keep in mind that the County Commissioners scheduled the public hearing about the County’s budget at 6:30 p.m. on October 22nd. So go on down to 220 North Main Street in Ann Arbor and give ‘em hell, Harry. Just one little detail—October 22nd is the day after the October 21st meeting at which the Commissioners will vote to finalize the decision of the Ways and Means Committee to impose the new property tax. 

Feel the urge to contact your County Commissioners and talk taxes? Click here.

Popularity: 19% [?]

October 8, 2009

The Politics of Modern Drama: The Ann Arbor Crucible, or Which Witches Should Be On Trial?

VN:F [1.9.3_1094]
Rate this posting
Rating: 4.8/5 (5 votes cast)

At the moment, one of the most popular A2Politico blog postings is: “The Politics of Opera: Conan di Lammermore Smith & the AADem Web site.”

For those who may not have read it, it’s an tragic (or comic) political opera in three acts that attempts to make sense of a personality conflict between three members on the Executive Board of the Ann Arbor City Democratic Party that was made very public when the following resolution was sent out to the group’s 600-member mailing list, and presented at the group’s October 11th meeting:

Whereas, the Secretary is empowered by the Executive Committee with arranging for correspondence and communication in concert with the Vice Chair for Communication as requested by the Chair; and
Whereas, LuAnne Bullington, current Vice Chair for Organizing and formerly Vice Chair for Communication, has been repeatedly asked since March 2009 by the Chair to provide control over the web domain aadems.org to officers of the Ann Arbor Democratic Party currently responsible for internal and external communications; and

Whereas, the Vice Chair for Organizing has refused to relinquish the username and passwords that would allow the current Vice Chair for Communications, Barbara Petersen, the full control over the internal and external communications tools of the Ann Arbor Democratic Party, including the web domain aadems.org;

Therefore Be It Resolved that the Vice Chair for Organizing, LuAnne Bullington, is hereby directed by the membership of the Ann Arbor Democratic Party to provide to the Vice Chair for Communications, Barbara Petersen, full access to and control over the domain aadems.org and any other communications tools of the Party within the next seven calendar days; and

Be It Further Resolved that if the Vice Chair for Organizing does not comply with this resolution that the Executive Committee of the Ann Arbor Democratic Party is hereby empowered to enact further sanctions against her, including ultimately her removal from office.

You’ll note, of course, that the resolution mentions only one person by name (LuAnne Bullington). You’ll also note that the author of the resolution is not indicated. Finally, you may also pick up that without an author it would appear that the resolution came from the group’s entire Executive Board.

As in all good drama, there was a plot twist revealed at the October 10th meeting. The resolution concerning Bullington’s refusal to cough up the password to the group’s domain account was not, in fact, from the entire Executive Board, but rather from the Chair, Conan Smith. Mid-meeting, a member of the group’s Board stood and confessed that he had never seen the resolution prior to the gathering. David Cahill (husband of First Ward Council member Sabra Briere), self-appointed parliamentarian, had more bad news. Robert’s Rules of Order required a formal hearing, as opposed to a kangaroo court. 

We have, however, moved from opera to modern drama. The Finale of “Conan di Lammermore Smith and the AADems Web site” gets a new title:

The Ann Arbor Crucible, or Which Witches Should Be On Trial?”

ACT ISalem, Mass., 1692

Scene opens with an email from AADem Chair Conan Smith to the AADem Executive Board. 

From: Conan Smith

Sent: Saturday, October 10, 2009 11:29 PM

To: 33 members of the Executive Board (including Mayor and all City Council members)

Subject: Invitee link for: A2DP Executive Committee

Executive Board Members:

First, allow me apologize—especially to LuAnne [Bullington, Vice Chair for Organization] and Barbara [Petersen, Vice Chair for Communication]—for having felt, erroneously, that the issue regarding our web domain needed to be dealt with by the membership.  Had I known the clause in Roberts Rules that David Cahill pointed out today, I would have brought this to you all originally.  While that is unfortunate, the issue still needs to be resolved, and now the membership has made it clear that this is the duty of the Executive Board.

Below you will find a link to ScheduleOnce, an online tool for scheduling meetings.  I have cleared my calendar for several time blocks over the next two weeks as the starting point for organizing this meeting.  I believe that two hours should be sufficient to take care of the limited business we currently have before us.

Currently, our agenda includes the following items.  Please contact me if you would like to add something to the list.

1. Approval of Meeting Minutes

2. Approval of the Treasurer’s Report

Anne has provided the treasurer’s report via email this past week; please refer to that document.

3. Governance Resolution Regarding aadems.org [This is the Main Event]

Per today’s instructions [from the membership at the October 10th AADems meeting], we will take up the resolution regarding control of our web domain.  I will ask an individual who is not part of the Executive Board to chair this portion of the meeting. If there are particular items you would like to have for this discussion, please let me know.

4. Determinations of Officers and Roles for 2010

Per the by-laws, the Executive Committee is charged with determining the roles for the vice chairs.  This is critical information that the Nominating Committee needs to complete its work before December.

5. New Business

6. Adjournment

ACT II—The Proscribed Outcome:

According to Robert’s Rules it is, in fact, the membership of a society that must decide the fate of its members, in this case, LuAnne Bullington. Conan Smith and his 32 colleagues on the Executive Board may want to play judge, jury and executioner, but that’s not parliamentary justice; that’s despotic mania at the worst, and simple ignorance of parliamentary procedure at best. The charges against Bullington, parliamentary rules require, should be referred to a Committee. According to Robert’s Rules, “Some societies have standing committees whose duty it is to report cases for discipline whenever any are known to them.” Alas, not the AADems. 

The Committee hears witnesses and gathers evidence. Then, the Committee presents its findings to the membership. Finally, it is the entire membership that votes on whether to punish the member.

ACT III—The Operatic Irony:

Robert’s Rules say, “When the charge is against the member’s character, it is usually referred to a committee of investigation or discipline, or to some standing committee, to report upon. Some societies have standing committees whose duty it is to report cases for discipline whenever any are known to them.”

So, one wonders, where were the charges and the committee to investigate the characters of the members of the AADems Executive Board whom the Ann Arbor News blasted in June and July 2009 for engaging in thoroughly disreputable, dishonest and possibly illegal use of email during open City Council meetings? These members of the AADem Executive Board were caught rigging votes, scripting debates, deliberating in secret. They were caught pandering to constituents and laughing at them behind their backs. They were caught treating their elected offices with disdain and disrespect—all acts condemned in an editorial in the local newspaper, and skewered with a damning political cartoon. 

As of yet, I haven’t read any newspaper editorial condemning Bullington’s actions, or questioning her character.

The Hieftje Eight, Leigh Greden, Marcia Higgins, Margie Teall, Carsten Hohnke, Stephen Rapundalo, Tony Derezinski, Sandi Smith and Christopher Taylor are all members of the AADem Executive Board, and have all been summoned by Chair Conan Smith to sit in judgement of the character of Vice Chair for Organization, LuAnne Bullington.

To be sure, County Commissioner and AADem Chair Conan Smith must be cast in the role of Cotton Mather. Witch trials in Ann Arbor.

May I suggest this AADem farce be put on at the Arthur Miller Theater on North Campus?

Popularity: 15% [?]

Older Posts »
Get Adobe Flash playerPlugin by wpburn.com wordpress themes